"I don't believe the Trinity, makes no sense to me at all. First of all, Jesus was a Jew and Jews have never worshipped a 3 in 1 God."
When Jesus came upon the scene many old Jewish headsets got changed. As a matter of fact, Jews still don?t recognize or accept Jesus, to this day.
"I've taken some Religious Studies courses and I'm not surprised learn that alot of professors affirm that the Trinity wasn't officially accepted until the 4th century CE. . . ."
Yes, most folks who do a study into the history of the Church and the Trinity learn these things.
"There are other discrepancies in the bible which we now know are not true. The scriptures that tell us that the Romans use to release a prisoner to the Jews "as was the custom", is not true. There is absolutely no historical evidence that the Romans ever did such a thing. There is also no historical record of a mass murder by Herod where all the boys 2 years of age and under were slaughtered."
When it comes to who Jesus claimed to be as well as who His followers claimed Him to be, all we really have is the Bible. Now, if you want to accept some of the Bible as accurate and others parts of it as not accurate, then be careful you?re not making your criteria based on what it is that "doesn?t make sense" to you (i.e., the Trinity).
"I also read in The First Three Centuries of the Church that one of the deciding factors in the Church making the Trinity a "fact" is that they knew that the Jews worshipped a monothesis God---Yahweh. If Christians did that, they felt that it would reduce Christianity to Judaism."
While I?m not familiar with this work, I do know that many authors (that I have read) interpret their point of view of history as a matter of fact. Comments like these are sometimes based on what the author believed the people of that time?s motives were, and that can be a pretty hard thing to understand or determine a couple of centuries removed.
Mary, here?s how I look at it. Trinity, shminity. Call it what you want. Believe in it if you want, or don?t. I don?t necessarily believe in the "Trinity" myself (nor do I disbelieve it either). But if the scriptures haven?t been modified to re-describe who Jesus was, but the scriptures are true and accurate, then it seems rather obvious that Jesus was Divine. There are many, many passages of scripture that clearly show He was much more than just a man or an angle. He was God according to Scripture, the way I see it. And logic dictates that if there can be only One God then ergo, the two (Father and Son) must be equally God. I don?t presume to fully grasp this concept, but then there are lots of things I don?t fully grasp. But that doesn?t mean these things don?t exist (the vastness of the Universe, Light and it?s speed, etc.)
There?s a thing called a Trinity wheel. It shows many connections of scripture of the Old Testament to the New Testament concerning Christ?s Deity. I wish I could find it. I?ll look for it and if I can find it I?ll post it on the forum. It really helps one to see who Jesus claimed Himself to be as well as who Scripture claimed Him to be.
I?m not really interested here in a Trinity pro?s and con?s debate. Reason being, that I am now at the point in my spiritual evolution that I don?t even know if I accept the Bible as the word of God anymore anyway. But, when I went through the transition many years ago from the Jehovah?s Witness concept of plural gods to the Christian concept of one God with three personalities, I had to relearn the whole thing and it gave me great insight to Jesus, according to Scripture. This seems to be an emotionally charged issue for many folks. I have no emotional involvement with it anymore. But its an interesting issue and one that comes up from time to time on forums such as these.
Steve